Considering the correlations receive, a couple of multiple regressions were did to know which variables could be thought to be predictor parameters of PCM and you will NCM in the modern attempt ( Dining table step three).

The relationship anywhere between childbearing motivations with fertility choices and actual child number in the reproductive-years ladies in Mashhad, Iran

Brand new patterns demonstrated from inside the Dining table step 3 were statistically significant and you will informed me 24% of your total variance off PCM and you can 10% out-of NCM. Eight of fourteen parameters reviewed exhibited on their own because extreme predictors away from PCM. thirty-two, ? = -.twenty-two and ? = .17, respectively. Regarding the NCM, merely five of one’s several details interviewed presented themselves once the predictor details. The latest variables with or perhaps not that have college students (? = .17), many years (? = .14), religiosity (? = -.12) and you may sex (? = .10) exhibited stronger relationship toward NCM.

The outcomes imply an average bad dating anywhere between both constructs; therefore, large amounts of PCM is actually on the lower levels off NCM and you will vice-versa

Correlations had been located between PCM, NCM and also the twelve details tested; also, eight parameters have been seen to be predictors from PCM and you may four was predictors from NCM, corroborating Miller’s proposal one to relates to CM given that constructs which can be influenced because of the several individual and you may contextual details ( Miller, Spaghetti, MacMurray, Muhleman, & Comings, 2000 Miller, W.