• Furukawa, S.; Fujita, T.; Shimabukuro, Meters.; Iwaki, Meters.; Yamada, Y.; Nakajima, Y.; Nakayama, O.; Makishima, Meters.; Matsuda, Meters.; Shimomura, We. Increased oxidative fret during the carrying excess fat and its own effect on metabolic problem. J. Clin. Investig. 2004, 114 , 1752–1761. [Google Beginner] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
• Chung, H.-K.; Yang, H.J.; Shin, D.; Chung, K.Roentgen. Aesthetics off Korean meals: The brand new symbol away from Korean people. J. Ethn. Snacks 2016, step three , 178–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
• Symons, Meters. Simmel’s gastronomic sociology: An overlooked essay. Dining Foodways 1994, 5 , 333–351. [Yahoo Beginner] [CrossRef]

Figure step 1. 1 p Value is founded on Chi-rectangular shot. MetS: Metabolic disorder; B: Breakfast; L: Lunch; and you will D: Restaurants.

Contour step one. 1 p Really worth is dependant on Chi-rectangular shot. MetS: Metabolic problem; B: Breakfast; L: Lunch; and you may D: Food.

Table step 1. Sociodemographic and you will life qualities off investigation professionals. Table 1. Sociodemographic and you can lifestyle features away from studies users. step 1 p Value will be based upon Chi-rectangular sample. B: Breakfast; L: Lunch; and you will D: Eating. step one p Worth is based on Chi-square sample.

Table 3. Body mass index, components of metabolic problem, and effort consumption from the activities off food by yourself within the guys and you may feminine.

Desk step 3. Bmi, areas of metabolic disorder, and effort intake because of the activities from dining by yourself from inside the dudes and you can feminine.

Bonferroni post-hoc test was conducted to test the differences between groups in patterns of eating alone. a,b,c Different letters, within a row, denote the significant differences between each group ( p value < 0.05).>